High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/2325/2016disposed of

Bharat Ram v. State Of Haryana & ORS

2016-02-05Ms. Justice Navita Singh,Mr Justice Jaswant Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2325 of 2016 Date of Decision: February 05, 2016 Bharat Ram ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

--- Present: Mr.Parveen Kumar Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Kirti Singh, Deputy AG, Haryana.

-.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 & 2 only at this stage.

On our asking, Ms.Kirti Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on their behalf. Let two copies of the writ petition be supplied to the State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution. Since the Gram Panchayat-respondent No.3 had consented to the terms and conditions for renewal of lease as is mentioned in the order dated 29.09.2015 passed by this Court in CWP No.13837 of 2015 (Baljeet Singh and others versus State of Haryana and others) and other connected cases (P-7), it is not necessary to call upon the Gram Panchayatrespondent No.3 nor any counter-reply from respondent Nos.1 & 2 is required.

MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.02.15 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.2325 of 2016 [2] Suffice it would be to mention that the petitioner also claims to be similarly placed lessee of the shop of the Gram Panchayat in village Matak Majri, Tehsil Indri, District Karnal. It is stated that eviction orders have been passed against the lessees whose cases were decided by this Court vide order dated 29.09.2015 (P-7). Since the terms and conditions imposed for the renewal of lease are acceptable to the petitioner, we dispose of the instant writ petition with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, to consider the claim of the petitioner also in the light of the order dated 29.09.2015 passed in Baljeet Singh and others' case (supra). Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE February 05, 2016 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.02.15 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh