High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/1798/2018disposed of

Narayan Singh And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

2018-02-22Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal,Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh2 pages

CWP-1798-2018 -1HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1798-2018 Date of Decision: February 22, 2018 Narayan Singh and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEKHER DHAWAN 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Ms.Anita Balyan, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Ankur Mittal, Addl.AG,Haryana with Mr.Manoj Dhankhar, AAG, Haryana with Mr.Ashok Garg, DTP, Jhajjar, Mr.Braham Parkash, LAO, Rohtak and Mr.Vikas Danda, EO, Bahadurgarh.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she does not press the question of applicability of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for brevity,'the 2013 Act') in the instant case, rather the petitioners seek a direction for consideration of their claim for the release of their land/property in terms of the decisions of this Court in CWP No.9082 of 2014 (Daulat Ram and others vs State of Haryana and others), decided on 21.02.2018, where reference has been made to the Meenu 2018.03.05 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh earlier decisions in (i) Reshma Footwears(P) Ltd. vs State of Haryana

CWP-1798-2018 -2and others, CWP No.2308 of 2004, decided on 21.06.2010, (ii) Lehri Singh and others vs Union of India and others, CWP No.11412 of 2004, decided on 25.08.2011 and (iii) Girdhari Lal and others vs Union of India and others, CWP No.17412 of 2004, decided on 21.04.2014, whereby a substantial part of the impugned acquisition already stands set aside by this Court on merits and for the reasons other than the applicability of 2013 Act. [2] Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the instant writ petition may also be disposed of in terms of the order dated 21.02.2018 passed in CWP No.9082 of 2014 (Daulat Ram and others vs State of Haryana and others).

[3] Ordered accordingly.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE February 22, 2018 ( SHEKHER DHAWAN ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2018.03.05 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh