Parveen Garg v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-16293-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 Parveen Garg

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and Others

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Uppal, Advocate, Mr. Himanshu Bindal, Advocate and Mr. Harsh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana (Through V.C.). Mr. Bhavesh Ola, Advocate for respondent No.5.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 19.05.2025 passed by respondent No.2.

2.

On 21.05.2026, the following order was passed: "Inter alia contends that petitioner preferred an application under Section 39 (4) of Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 assailing voter list. The District Registrar of Societies vide order dated 08.05.2026 stayed election process and ordered to examine and rectify list of members to ensure free and fair elections process. The said order was challenged before State Registrar who by order dated 19.05.2026 set aside order passed by District Registrar and ordered to conduct election as per schedule. The petitioner has preferred PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.05.27 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-16293-2026 (O&M) -2appeal before Registrar General which is still pending. If elections are conducted without adjudicating petitioner's appeal it would amount to denial of his right to assail voter list. The District Registrar had passed reasoned order which has been set aside by State Registrar in a mechanical manner.

Notice of motion returnable for 27.05.2026.

Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana who on advance notice is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. He seeks time to take instructions and file reply, if any.

Let respondents No.4 and 5 be served through dasti as well.

In the meantime, it would be appropriate if Registrar General adjudicates petitioner's appeal. The Returning Officer-respondent No.4 is directed to keep elections process in abeyance."

3.

Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that Registrar General has set aside the order passed by State Registrar. The grievance of petitioner stands redressed, thus, petition has rendered infructuous.

4.

Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 5.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 27.05.2026 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.05.27 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document