Bhim Sain Gupta v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP No.23348 of 2016 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.23348 of 2016 Date of decision:19.09.2017 Bhim Sain Gupta ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. A.D.S.Jattana, Advocate for the petitioner.

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside the order dated 22.05.2015 (Annexure P-3) issued by respondent No.3, whereby instead of taking action against the persons who had been promoted to the post of Statistical Assistant against the norms and availability of vacancies, had ordered that no action should be taken and the reason given for taking no action is that in case action is taken there would be litigation.

2.

At the outset, when learned counsel for the petitioner was confronted as to how the present writ petition (PIL) is maintainable in case of service matter, he submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition (PIL) with liberty to either file a writ of quo-warranto or avail any other alternative remedy in accordance with law. Savita 2017.09.21 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.23348 of 2016 {2} 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

However, it shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him, in accordance with law (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 19, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.09.21 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh