Naresh Kumar And ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.24309 of 2015 Date of Decision: November 19, 2015 Naresh Kumar and another ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA.

--- Present: Mr.Vivek Govel, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 & 2 only at this stage.

On our asking, Ms.Kirti Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on their behalf. Let two copies of the writ petition be supplied to the State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution. Since the Gram Panchayat-respondent No.3 had consented to the terms and conditions for renewal of lease as is mentioned in the order dated 29.09.2015 passed by this Court in CWP No.13837 of 2015 (Baljeet Singh and others versus State of Haryana and others) and connected cases (P-6), it is not necessary to call upon the Gram PanchayatMOHINDER KUMAR 2015.12.19 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.24309 of 2015 [2] respondent No.3 nor any counter-reply from respondent No.1& 2 is required.

Suffice it would be to mention that the petitioners also claim to be similarly placed lessees of the shops of the Gram Panchayat in village Matak Majri, Tehsil Indri, District Karnal. It is stated that eviction orders have been passed against the petitioners in the same manner as were passed against the lessees whose cases were decided by this Court vide order dated 29.09.2015 (P-6). Since the terms and conditions imposed for the renewal of lease are acceptable to the petitioners, we dispose of the instant writ petition with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, to consider the claim of the petitioners also in the light of the order dated 29.09.2015 passed in Baljeet Singh and others's case (supra). Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE November 19, 2015 [HARI PAL VERMA] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.12.19 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh