High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/18409/2020dismissed

Dharminder Singh v. Union Of India And Others

2024-04-01Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

CWP-18409-2020 2024:PHHC:042866

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18409-2020 Date of Decision : 01.04.2024 DHARMINDER SINGH ... PETITIONER

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.Amit Kaith, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Shivoy Dhir, Sr. Panel Counsel for Mr. Satish Saini, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.1-UOI.

Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 22.09.2020 (Annexure P-5) whereby his candidature was rejected in Group-1 and he was shifted to Group-3.

Counsel for the respondent, at the outset, submits that another candidate has already been selected and claim of the petitioner was rejected because he offered unregistered lease deed. In the brochure, it is specifically mentioned that lease deed should be registered, thus, he was shifted to Group-3. Another candidate in Group-1 was available, thus he came to be selected. Anju Goel 2024.04.01 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-18409-2020 2024:PHHC:042866 3.

Faced with this, counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition and seeks permission to avail remedies as permissible by law. 4.

Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 01.04.2024 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anju Goel 2024.04.01 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh