Gurmail Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19894-2017 Date of Decision: December 06, 2017 Gurmail Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Arunjeet Singh Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Anu Pal, AAG, Punjab.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

General Manager-cum-Mining Officer, District Industries Centre, Faridkot, has filed the affidavit dated 06.12.2017, which is taken on record. It is averred that compensation for the first quarter amounting to Rs.1,73,835/- has been paid to the petitioner vide cheque dated 22.11.2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits and rightly so that meanwhile amount towards second quarter has also become due. The authorities are directed to ensure the payment of such amount also on time with a further direction that in future also the due amount shall be paid to the petitioner on time without forcing him to approach the Court. Needless to say that if the petitioner is again compelled to approach this Court, the authorities will liable to pay compensation, interest and suitable costs. Disposed of.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE December 06, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.12.11 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh