High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/23505/2016disposed of

Gurjant Singh v. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd & ORS

2018-11-22Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-23505-2016 (O&M) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-23505-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: - 22.11.2018 Gurjant Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

PSPCL and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Piyush Khanna, Advocate for the respondents.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present writ petition, the claim has been made by the petitioner that his service, which he rendered on work charge basis, should be taken into consideration while calculating his pensionary benefits. In this petition, he prayed for recalculating his pensionary benefits after adding work charge service as well. Notice of motion was issued.

Counsel for the respondents has placed on record copy an order dated 10.01.2018 by which, claim of the petitioner stands admitted and his pensionary benefits were revised. The difference of gratuity amounting to `44,429/- has already been paid to the petitioner. Further, NARESH KUMAR 2018.11.28 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-23505-2016 (O&M) -2counsel for the respondent states that even the pension of the petitioner has also been revised and arrears of pension has also been released to him.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not in a position to rebut the statement made on behalf of the respondents and time be granted to verify the same.

In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondents, the present petition stands disposed of as no further cause of action survives.

In case, the petitioner is left for any other claim, he will be at liberty to file a representation with the respondents for the same within a period of four months from today. Further, if any such representation is filed, then the same shall be decided expeditiously within a period of three months thereafter.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) November 22, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2018.11.28 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh