Raman Sharma v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

CWP No.19984 of 2017 (O&M) {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19984 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision:02.11.2017 Raman Sharma ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Amrit Paul, Advocate for respondent No.4.

Mr. A.S.Talwar, Advocate for respondent No.6.

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) C.M.No.13439 of 2017 Additional facts/grounds by way of additional affidavit filed alongwith application are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Office to tag the same at an appropriate place. C.M. stands disposed of.

CWP No.19984 of 2017 1.

In this writ petition filed by way of Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has primarily Savita 2017.12.04 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.19984 of 2017 (O&M) {2} prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing respondents No.1 to 6 to give free treatment to Ms. Poonam, who is suffering from cancer.

2.

In the reply submitted by the respondents, it is stated therein that free treatment has been given to Ms. Poonam for cancer ailment. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the fact that Ms. Poonam, who is suffering from cancer has been given treatment without any charges. He, however, prayed that liberty be granted to raise certain ancillary issues which arise in this matter before the appropriate authority. 4.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusing the record and keeping in view the fact that the free treatment is being given to the patient namely Ms. Poonam, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the concerned State authority for redressal of his grievance in case something survives or arises for their consideration in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (AMIT RAWAL) November 02, 2017 JUDGE savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.12.04 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh