Sahil Garg v. State Of Haryana & ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Date of decision: Sahil Garg
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
****
!
Prayer in the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to issue appointment letter to the petitioner for the post of Extension Lecturer(Chemistry) by replacing the non-eligible candidates working on the said post in view of the direction passed by a Coordinate Bench in CWP-16975-2014 titled as 'Mrs. Rita Tandon Vs. State of Haryana and Others' decided on 29.07.2016 (Annexure P-9), UGC Regulation 2010 (Annexure P-10) and Guidelines issued by respondent No.2 (Annexure P-12), as the petitioner has already stands selected after participating in the selection process in terms of advertisement (Annexure P-1). !""
# $% & $%%
'( () *('+,"-. % & $% / &
% &0 ! / $% "& 1 %% % & / $% $ &% && %$# %& & # '2 & & ! 3/ 4& $ $5"+677" *('- % & The said writ petition was disposed of in terms of order passed in CWP-9300-2015 titled as 'Mrs. Menka and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.' decided on 05.05.
2016, wherein the petitioners were allowed to continue to work on the post till regular appointment. Learned State counsel further points out that as per the Policy dated 04.03.2020, the displaced person on joining of a regular employee is to be protected, if there is a sufficient workload and the case of the petitioner can be considered as per Policy dated 04.03.2020. The department is in the process of implementing the Policy dated 04.03.2020. 1 $% % !"
& $%% '( () *('+,"-. $% /& % &0 ! / $% "& $ 8in CWP-93002015 titled as 'Mrs. Menka and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.' decided on 05.05.2016, allowed the similarly situated employees to continue to work on the post till regular appointment and as per the learned State counsel the respondent-Department is in the process of implementing the Policy dated 04.03.2020, according to which, the displaced person on joining of a regular employee is to be protected, if there is a sufficient workload. 1 $
,*. () (2 *(*( & 3/ 9
:&
3 ,$ $ . "8 &
% $ 1 % $
& &% % % & $ &3/ &
& %
& &$
:%
8 $ % ;
*(*( ,). $ < 7*2 &3/
% & $ % " ! " #
# $ "% %&"$ "$ "$ $ "
"$ % '(
$$$$)*+% "%"!$ " ! ,( - -" " $ % "
"$ ( " ," !
$ $
.
$ " $ "
( " !" !$"$$ " !" !$ "
$ -" " ! "
&" - ' ("$
$ ", % %" -
/ %$. ! &$
$
",
," $/ $"$$ %!$ #) # 012 - "$ 3" +"
4$ 5" - 6"!"
" "
$
2# 2# 0"$( "$7 " # # "$$ % -(
' "
"$% ) # 202 - 2 "$8 "4$5" -6"!"
" "
$#. 1 & & & 8 % 4 , . " =< & & & & < & %%% &
& & % %% % () (2 *(*( ,"'*. & 3/ 2
&
% & $ %%% = In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Director General, Department of Higher Education Haryana, to consider the case of the petitioner as per the Policy dated 04.03.2020, if he be so covered thereunder, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law.
"
"
" 5 5 : !> ?:# 5 &> ?:#