Court On Its Own Motion v. State Of Haryana

 
 

   !




    "# $

%&' (')*+*,-.

 
 



       

  
 - /0 "
  1"       

   

        !



 1" 02 #%3 "

# $ $ % &  '  (    )"* &     
        $&& $+


        

          

            !           !

 

 "        !   #

     "

$             %      &       

     ' $"()(* '

+)'  ),  +   -("*-"-*(."
,$ '  (    '  
 '-  ' . 

    '&    '  '    '&  


  /  0


  01 $    
& /23 * 1 &  $& & $$  $ ' $'

'&     && 4      ' 
  '  '

 '&


  '   (    ' $'& '


   &         '     
&     /23   * 1         ' -&& 3 

"

  '  '  '& '


  '   (   &            ' 
& /23 * 1

   &  4&   .  '

     '&  '   $&  & $$ &    &'


   $     (   $    + &    $  '        & 5   '  '   
 2   &$'&    $   
&  23   $   
    2 $&        &  '.   6      

3         
&     /23   * 1       -&  2 $& & $$     &  '.   & 778 #     

.

 , #  &$2 $&    &    '      ' 
&  /23 * 1 &&  ,' $ 4 &&$& ' '&   & 2 $& & $$ ,          3   '      '  

  * .$  
  0 

&"*3%4%5%,(&6'#+7'#+8+"&%&' %#9%,%%,(&6'#+   9:

;7 !;;<   ' &  + "We have considered the solitary contention advance by the learned counsel for the appellants. The learned Single Judge while disposing of CWP No.1820 of 2009 vide order dated 5.2.2009, had clearly noticed, that the eligibility condition for taking Haryana Civil Services Examination is graduation, and as such, merely on account of the fact that the appellants had answered their questions upto matriculation in Hindi, would not justify a claim, that the question papers should be set in English. It is also clear that all the appellants were sufficiently acquainted with the English language, so as to enable them to understand the questions posed in the Haryana Civil Services Examination. In this behalf, the learned Single Judge while disposing of CWP No.

1820 of 2009 had expressly noticed, that the first petitioner i.e., the appellant No.1, had acquired the qualification M.Phil in Philosophy, the 2nd petitioner, i.e., appellant No.2 possessed a of Master's degree in Philosophy, and the third petitioner i.e., appellant No.

Examination, as the appellants had pursued their academic career after qualifying the matriculation examination in English. We find no infirmity in the aforesaid conclusion.""  '4           '        1" 0     "':&'5;'#.2  / (