Areyan v. State Of Ut Chd. And Others

133-2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30745-2025 DECIDED ON: 06.03.2026 AREYAN .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF UT CHD. AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Bansal, PP, UT, Chandigarh.

Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1.

Present petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.190 dated 22.12.2024, under Sections 109, 3(5) of BNS, registered at Police Station Sector 39, Chandigarh, as well as all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise between the parties.

2.

It is informed by learned State counsel that matter has been amicably settled between the parties, i.e. petitioner as well as respondent No.2 - Rahul Rawat only. However, respondent No.3 - Subhasish has not been made party to the compromise. Therefore, present petition being partial compromise, cannot be entertained, in view of the judgement passed by this Court, in the case of Rakesh Das vs. State of Haryana and another, 2024 NCPHHC 147654.

LAVISHA 2026.03.07 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh

CRM-M-30745-2025 -23.

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, present petition stands dismissed, being not maintainable. 4.

However, it will be open for the petitioner to file a fresh comprehensive petition based upon compromise, by impleading all the necessary parties, i.e. all the accused and the injured/victim(s). (SANJAY VASHISTH) 06.03.2026 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.03.07 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh