Santosh Gupta v. State Bank Of Patiala & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-23721-2016 Date of decision: 02.02.2017 Santosh Gupta ..... Petitioner

Versus

State Bank of Patiala and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia seeking a direction to the respondents to accept the One Time Settlement scheme of the petitioner. 2.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedies as may be available to her, in accordance with law.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies, as may be available to her, in accordance with law.

( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE February 02, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2017.02.03 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Whether Reportable Yes/No