Satpal Bansal v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-20207-2017 (O&M) Date of decision:- 07.09.2017 Satpal Bansal

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present:- Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (ORAL) The petitioner had earlier complained of an encroachment by way of excess construction by some of the private respondents. The petitioner had also filed CWP-15010-2008 which was disposed of by an order and judgement of a Division Bench of this Court dated 29.04.2010. The order, inter alia, stated that the excess coverage/encroachment on the petitioner's land had been removed. The petition was accordingly disposed of as infructuous. 2.

The petitioner alleges that once again, there is an encroachment/illegal construction by the private respondents. The petitioner at this stage merely seeks an order directing the official respondents to consider his applications dated 07.02.2017 (Annexure P-6) and 08.03.2017 (Annexure P-7). 3.

The petition is accordingly disposed of by directing the authorities concerned to respond to the petitioner's applications/complaint dated 07.02.2017 (Annexure P-6) and 08.03.2017 (Annexure P-7). Needless to state that the official respondents shall take action, if any, only after considering the responses of the private respondents as well. (S.J. VAZIFDAR) CHIEF JUSTICE (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) JUDGE 07.09.2017 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Amodh Sharma 2017.09.07 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh