Mito v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M-36878-2022 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36878-2022 Date of Decision: August 22, 2022 Mito .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Nitin Neel, Advocate for Mr.K.B.Raheja, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to take legal action against the private respondent No.4 as per application, Annexure P-3 and to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of private respondent No.4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if her representation, dated 21.07.2022, Annexure P-3, is decided in a time-bound manner.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr.Arun Luthra, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. Heard.

In view of the abovesaid facts, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2, i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur, to look into the representation, dated 21.07.2022, Annexure P-3 MEENU 2022.08.23 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-36878-2022 -2and decide the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and preferably within one month from today.

August 22, 2022 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2022.08.23 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment