Daya Kishan @ Talli v. State Of Haryana & Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-18601-2018 (O & M) Date of decision: 30.10.2018 Daya Kishan alias Tali .... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and ors.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. A.S. Sheoran, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Safia Gupta, AAG, Haryana.

***** RAJAN GUPTA , J. (Oral) Petitioner has impugned order dated 21.06.2018, Annexure P-1, passed by the Commissioner, Rohtak Division-respondent No.2. He submits that his parole has been rejected on the ground that he is habitual offender. The authorities have not been taken into consideration the fact that the petitioner has availed the benefit of parole four times earlier. He requires parole for agriculture purpose.

A perusal of the impugned order shows that same is cryptic and does not deal with all the pleas raised by the petitioner. Same is hereby set aside and is remitted to the same authority for a decision afresh within two weeks from today.

Allowed in these terms.

(RAJAN GUPTA) October 30, 2018 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2018.11.01 04:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document