Satish Kumar v. Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.16342 of 2024(O&M) Date of Decision:28.10.2025 Satish Kumar ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. P.S.Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Addl. Solicitor General of India with Ms. Shreyansi Verma, Central Government Counsel for Union of India *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that grievance of the petitioner, at this stage, would be redressed if respondent No. 7 is directed to consider and address Annexure P-7 i.e. application dated 04.11.2024 filed by the petitioner.

2.

Faced with this, learned counsel for the respondents submits that competent authority would look into the matter and address Annexure P-7 within four weeks from today.

3.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of.

4.

Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 28.10.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes No Whether reportable:

Yes No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.10.28 04:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document