Brij Mohan v. State Of Punjab
101+204
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36565-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.01.2023 BRIJ MOHAN
...Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :
Mr. Monty Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. SubhashGodara, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Manish Verma, Advocate for the complainant.
HARSH BUNGER, J.
!"# #!#$!"#"% "&&'&$&$% %"#()
%&# *+ !', -./ (%0! )
1
3
2 !*
4 5 !% 2
4
6 * ,
7
3
8
!""'6 2
* ,
"#%'("#%& -%9
0 ):; !7 4 8 !"%" 2
,
4
6 * , #&!#'!"#%<! "#!#'!"#"#
!"
;9 3= , *+ 2
!
2
/ %!%"!"#"#! 82+
):; + 2
:
4 2
: 4
+ /
+ :
4 2
+(
!
2
2 !;&"$;;>&"$&(;(&"$$
+
2
2
+ 6: 2
!
.2
? 2
+
+(
2
2 9
+
2
6: 7 ):; :
4 %!%"!"#%
7!
2 6: 7 ): ; +
!' %!#&!"#"# + 2 + -%0
!'
%'
+ %!#&!"#"#%!%"!"#%! /
!%' ;9 )) !
( +
:
4 !2
2
!'#
! @
+(
1
! ,
/ 2
"#!#'!"#"# "<!%"!"#"# 2
+
!%%######9(!
/
%!%"!"#%
A ( :
4 / B2 .C ! ,
2
:
4
2 2 + !,
1
%&!#!"#%<
/ ):; -0
+ +
/ ! ,
2 / !'#
2 2
+
!"#"% "" + 8
2
* , !82+
+
2
!, 2
to join investigation as and when required by the Investigating Agency. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the prayer of bail to the petitioner on the ground of seriousness of offence by submitting that it is a case of clear forgery and hence, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required to know about the factual position. Accordingly, he prayed for dismissal of this petition.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the paper book with their able assistance.
It is well settled that p
/
!
+
!
# $%
2
%!%"!"#%
2
-%0
!'
%'!D+
%!#&!"#"# %!%"!"#%!
+
!%';9 )) !
+2
+ 1
+ +
+
&#
+
+ +
+ 2
+ + +
!
!"8E
./
+
1
+ 1 2
+ ! 4 +2
+
/
! . !!!
!"# #!#$!"#"% "&&'&$&$% %"#()
%&# *+ !', ?
!
+
/
2
+
2 :
! 9
!
January 25, 2023 (HARSH BUNGER) gurpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No