← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCOCP/2321/2024dismissed

The Jafaradbad Coop. Trasport Society Gurgram v. Yashendra Singh, Ias Transport Commissioner, Haryana

2026-05-20Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl2 pages

COCP No.2321 of 2024 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2321 of 2024 (O&M) Date of decision: May 20th, 2026 The Jafarabad Coop. Transport Society .....Petitioner

Versus

Yashendra Singh, IAS .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Present:

Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1.

This is a contempt petition filed under Section 2(b) read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for his willful and intentional disobedience of the order dated 19.04.2024 passed by this Court. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not satisfied with the order dated 11.10.2024 and has further submitted that against the said order, an appeal is maintainable under Section 89 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It is submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file the said appeal. It is further submitted that since the petitioner was pursuing the present remedy, thus, in case the said appeal is filed within a period of one month from today, then, the Appellate Authority be directed not to decide or dismiss the same on the ground of limitation.

3.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.05.22 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

COCP No.2321 of 2024 (O&M) petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to challenge the order dated 11.10.2024 in accordance with law. In case the appeal against the said order is maintainable and the said appeal is filed within a period of one month from today, then, Appellate Authority is requested to not dismiss the same solely on the ground of limitation. 4.

It is made clear that this Court has not opined on the maintainability or otherwise of the said appeal, which would be considered independently by the authority before whom the said appeal is filed. 5.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. May 20th, 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.05.22 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh