Shiv Shakti Trader v. State Of Punjab & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 24005 of 2016 (O&M) Decided on : 11.10.2017 Shiv Shakti Trader (Regd.) . . . Petitioner

Versus

The State of Punjab and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL PRESENT: Mr. H.S. Thiara, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Rameeza Hakeem, Addl. AG, Punjab.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of order dated 17.06.2016 (Annexure P-10), passed by respondent No.2. A further prayer has also been made for issuance of direction to the respondents not to ask for liquor license fee (L2 & L14) for Zone No. 9 and 19 of the Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar, for the month of April 2016, as no liquor was supplied to the petitioner for this month and to refund the security and other fees deposited by the petitioner for the month of April, 2016 or to adjust the same in the coming months i.e. license fee be charged only for 11 months and liquor too be supplied for 11 months.

2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that certain questions of fact are required to be established by leading evidence. Therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner either to approach the Civil Court Jawala Ram 2017.10.12 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 24005 of 2016 (O&M) - 2 - or to avail an alternative remedy as may be available to it, in accordance with law.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to it, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE October 11, 2017 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No Jawala Ram 2017.10.12 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh