Harpreet Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others
CRM-M-33877-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33877-2024 Date of decision: 05.12.2024 HARPREET SINGH AND OTHERS
...Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Present:
Mr. Tajinder Pal Singh Makar, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Deepinder Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Satnam Singh, Advocate and Ms. Diksha Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
**** N. S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.27 dated 11.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Lakho Ke Behram, District Ferozepur along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 21.06.2024 (Annexure P-3) arrived at between the parties.
Vide order dated 18.07.2024 while issuing notice of motion, by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 21.06.2024 (Annexure P-3) MAMTA 2024.12.10 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CRM-M-33877-2024 Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guruharsahai and got their statements recorded. Report dated 23.08.2024 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioner(s).
Resultantly, FIR No.27 dated 11.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Lakho Ke Behram, District Ferozepur alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner(s). (N. S. SHEKHAWAT) 05.12.2024 JUDGE M.Sikka Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No MAMTA 2024.12.10 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment