Rampal And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.25039 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.12.2015 **** Rampal & Ors.

... Petitioners VS.

State of Haryana & Ors.

... Respondents **** CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI ****

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ****

Present:

Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioners **** SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)

(1)
Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, the respondent-authorities have considered the petitioners' objections regarding ward-bandi of their village and turned down those objections by way of a reasoned order.

(2)
We have gone through the self-speaking order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (C), Shahabad and see no reason to travel into the series of disputed facts highlighted by the petitioners in support of their demand for undertaking fresh exercise of ward-bandi. We are afraid such like issues do not fall within the ambit of writ jurisdiction. The petitioners, if aggrieved, may approach the District Election Officer or any other higher authorities in the State, if so advised.

(3)
Disposed of.













 

 

 

 


      

 
  
  
  
  
  

 

 

 

 

V.VISHAL 2015.12.03 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document