High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/19507/2021disposed of

Poonam Rani And ANR v. Union Of India And ANR

2022-03-02Mr. Justice Rajbir Sehrawat2 pages

CWP-19507-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19507-2021(O&M) Date of Decision : 02.03.2022 Poonam Rani and another

...Petitioners

Versus

Union of India and another

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT

Present:

Mr. Sumeet Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI.

Mr. Shireesh Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2.

(In virtual Court) **** RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the office orders dated 26.07.2021, 30.07.2021 and 18.08.2021 (Annexures P-9 to P-11), respectively vide which the promotions granted to the petitioners by office memorandum dated 28.07.2017 (Annexure P-6) has been withdrawn, as well as, the consequential recovery, alongwith certain other prayers made in the petition.

Notice of motion was issued vide this Courts order dated 28.09.2021.

The counsel for the respondents has submitted that the respondents are withdrawing the impugned order so as to revisit the entire matter.

MANPREET SINGH 2022.03.07 14:57 I attest to the accuracy of this order.

CWP-19507-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous but liberty may be granted to the petitioners to approach this Court again, if so required. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous.

Dismissed as such.

However, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail their remedy again, in accordance with law, if any order is passed against them by the respondents.

(RAJBIR SEHRAWAT) JUDGE March 02, 2022 Manpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MANPREET SINGH 2022.03.07 14:57 I attest to the accuracy of this order.