← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaINCOMP/89/2024disposed of

Vishal v. State Of Haryana

2024-11-21Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara2 pages

INCOMP-89-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

INCOMP No. 89 of 2024 Date of Decision: 21.11.2024 Vishal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Sr. DAG, Haryana (Through VC).

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

The aforesaid petition was filed on 23.07.2019 by Sh. Prabhjeet Singh Sullar, Advocate. The Registry had raised objection on the case file on 23.07.2019. 2.

State counsel submits that on enquiry, it is reported that the petitioner is still in custody. However, the present case is incomplete and as such, this Court cannot proceed any further.

3.

As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. The same was not taken back for re-filing after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Note was published by the Registry in the cause list, whereby the advocates were requested to collect their all cases lying with objections for re-filing after removal of objections. 4.

It was further notified that all pending cases of this type will be listed in Court for appropriate order. The case was shown in the cause list. No one was present on behalf of the petitioner on the last date, nor today. Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, no further order is required to be passed and the same is disposed of, with observations that the concerned District Legal Authority to contact the petitioner in the Sonia Puri 2024.11.22 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

INCOMP-89-2024 present case and apprise him of his legal right to file an appropriate application for bail, either before the Sessions Court concerned or before this Court. Further, in case the petitioner needs assistance of legal aid counsel, the same shall also be provided to him. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 21.11.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Sonia Puri 2024.11.22 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document