Murti Devi v. State Of Haryana And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2071 of 2017 Date of Decision.03.02.2017 Murti Devi ........Petitioner Vs State of Haryana and others ........Respondents
Present:
Mr. Manoj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 3rd respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad to take appropriate action on the representation dated 18.11.2016 (Annexure P-5) within a stipulated period.
Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct the 3rd respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad to consider the representation dated 18.11.2016 (Annexure P-5) within a period three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 03, 2017 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.02.07 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document