Sonu Kumar v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 20.09.2017 CWP No.25242 of 2015 Sonu Kumar ... Petitioner versus State of Haryana & ors.

... Respondents CWP No.27113 of 2015 Azad Kumar ... Petitioner versus State of Haryana & ors.

... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. AG, Haryana.

**** Amol Rattan Singh, J.(Oral) This order will dispose of these two writ petitions, as the same question of law is involved in them.

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) do not deny that the issue in the present petitions is the same as in CWP No.22983 of 2014, titled as Sunita Devi vs. State of Haryana & anr., though the posts in question are different.

In these cases also, it is stated that the instructions dated 04.04.2014 were issued within the validity of the waiting list in question in both the petitions. By the said instructions, a decision was taken by the respondent- Government to not re-advertise the unfilled posts in the Sonia Bura 2017.10.06 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

CWP No.25242 of 2015 -2ESM/DESM category, and instead to fill them up from the waiting list of the vertical reservation category or the general category (as the case may be), of the same selection process.

The factual position could not be denied by learned State counsel, though he has otherwise raised the same arguments as were raised by the State in Sunita Devi's case(supra).

Consequently, these writ petitions are allowed in the same terms as CWP No.22983 of 2014.

20.09.2017 (Amol Rattan Singh) sonia Judge

1. Whether speaking/non-speaking?

Yes

2. Whether reportable?

Yes Sonia Bura 2017.10.06 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh