Raj Kumar v. Estate Officer Chd & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-20763-2017 (O&M) Date of decision:- 13.09.2017 Raj Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

The Estate officer, Union Territory, Chandigarh and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (ORAL) Issue notice of motion returnable forthwith.

Service is waived, Ms. Sukhmani Patwalia, learned counsel having accepted notice on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner merely seeks an order directing the respondents to comply with the order and judgement of a Division Bench of this Court dated 29.07.2016 in CWP-12482-2016 (Annexure P-3).

2.

The order directed the respondents to expeditiously decide the representation, if made by the petitioner, by a speaking order. A representation was made. No date was fixed for passing the order. However, the same should have been done within a reasonable time.

3.

The petition is, therefore, disposed of by directing the respondents to comply with the order dated 29.07.2016 (Annexure P-3) by 23.10.2017. The petitioner shall appear before respondent No. 1 on 18.09.2017 at 11.00 AM in the first instance and thereafter as directed by respondent No. 1.

4.

The petition be placed on board on 25.10.2017 to ensure compliance.

(S.J. VAZIFDAR) CHIEF JUSTICE (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) JUDGE 13.09.2017 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Amodh Sharma 2017.09.13 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh