Nirmal Saini & ANR v. Union Of India And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24522-2016 Date of Decision: October 09, 2018 Nirmal Saini and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Union of India and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr.Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms.Ranjana Shahi, Advocate for the respondents. ........

RAJESH BINDAL, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in pursuance to the decree of mandatory injunction passed by the Civil Court in favour of the petitioners.

Ordered accordingly.

( RAJESH BINDAL ) JUDGE October 09, 2018 ( AMIT RAWAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2018.10.15 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh