Manju v. Bhim Sain Alias Ravi

TA-808-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.109 TA-808-2025 Date of Decision: 25.02.2026 MANJU ....Applicant

Versus

BHIM SAIN ALIAS RAVI .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Ms. Palak Arora, Advocate for Mr. S.K.Verma, Advocate for the applicant.

None for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of respondent. Even, reply not filed, despite last opportunity. As such, the respondent is proceeded against ex parte.

Counsel for the applicant heard.

The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/32/2024, titled 'Bhim Sain @ Ravi Vs. Manju', filed by the respondenthusband, pending in the Family Court (Camp Court), Dhuri, District Sangrur and she seeks transfer of the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Rohtak.

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 14.07.2013 and two daughters aged 9 years and 6 years, respectively, born from the said wedlock, are in the care and custody of the applicant. The applicant is not having any source of PREETI 2026.03.20 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

TA-808-2025 earning. She has filed petition under Section 12 read with Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, which is pending in the Courts at Rohtak and the same is at the appearance stage. Also, she has filed petition under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. and the same is at the stage of evidence. The distance between the two places is stated to be 190-200 kilometres.

Considering the aforesaid circumstances, more particularly, considering the fact of applicant taking care of the two minor daughters while herself having no source of earning, the distance between the two places and the fact of two other litigation, arising from this broken marriage, to be already pending in the Courts at Rohtak and above it, the respondent not having come forward to resist the transfer application, the same is allowed and the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/32/2024, titled 'Bhim Sain @ Ravi Vs. Manju', filed by the respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court (Camp Court), Dhuri, District Sangrur to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Rohtak. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court (Camp Court), Dhuri, to the District and Sessions Judge, Rohtak.

Learned District and Sessions Judge, Rohtak, shall assign the said petition to the Family Court, Rohtak. Even, the parties are directed to appear before the Family Court, Rohtak, within a period of one month from today onwards.

(ARCHANA PURI) 25.02.2026 JUDGE Preeti S.

Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No PREETI 2026.03.20 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document