Satbir v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No.36818 of 2022 (O&M) ::1::

   

     

   


 ! "#$ %$&'(')*





  




     



 

* +,  - . ///  

 
 



       
  

   

 

    !    "

  /// .0   ,!   #  

 

$   



%&'   

 $$ 

 

   ()* &%+ ,,+-.+.,      



&/') 0



&%1.+,)  $ 

2

$




3$) $   4     

   ,,,..+..5    "

  4 
  



 4  

0  2  



$ 
 has been filed. The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2021 and has already suffered incarceration for 1 year and 16 days. Investigation stands concluded and thus there cannot be any apprehension that the petitioner shall tamper with the evidence. He thus prays that in these circumstances the petitioner would be entitled for regular bail.

POOJA SHARMA 2022.12.12 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M No.36818 of 2022 (O&M) ::2::

Per contra learned State counsel states that as per the custody certificate, the petitioner is facing 3 more cases involving similar allegations apart from FIR No.545/2017 wherein the petitioner has earned acquittal. He thus submits that the petitioner is a habitual offender and thus he should not be granted any indulgence.

Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in all the 3 cases pending against the petitioner, he has been granted regular bail. In FIR No.466 dated 18.10.2021, the petitioner stands admitted to regular bail vide order dated 23.02.2022, in FIR No.162 dated 26.05.2021, the petitioner stands admitted to regular bail vide order dated 13.05.2022. Likewise in FIR No.706 dated 10.10.2021 also, he has been granted bail vide order dated 29.10.2021.

)   5    

             

  5



 



  

   6

    5

  





$  

$  



$$   

  

 

 

$$ #

 

      $  

$

    $1 

 

 

 

7#$

14





 *

$         

   $$



      





  

    .!     





 





 6 1 

  



  $  *

POOJA SHARMA 2022.12.12 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.