Neena Roy And Others v. State Of Haryana

223-2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40621-2021 (O&M) Date of decision-20.01.2022 Neena Roy and others

...Petitioners

Vs.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr. Arjun Veer Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Virk, DAG, Haryana.

*** RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (ORAL) Matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing via Webex facility in the light of Pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions.

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.470, dated 26.08.2021 registered for offence under Sections 406, 498-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station City, Kaithal.

By virtue of the order dated 28.09.2021, while granting interim protection, the petitioners were directed to join investigation. GEETA RANI 2022.01.21 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-40621-2021(O&M) --2-- It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have joined the investigation and fully cooperated and thus, the interim order may kindly be made absolute. Learned State counsel has endorsed the same and submitted that petitioners are no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, the order dated 28.09.2021 is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and the petition stands allowed. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE 20.01.2022 geeta Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No GEETA RANI 2022.01.21 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document