High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/37522/2022disposed of

Parshotam Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another

2023-02-16Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37522-2022 Date of Decision: 16.02.2022 Parshotam Singh ......... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sinish Girdhar, AAG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Aggrieved by framing of charges, the petitioner came up before this Court. Counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR qua two similarly placed co-accused was quashed by this Court and despite that charges have been framed against the petitioner. He further submits that in fact this is the case trial Court should considered provision of Section 245 Cr.P.C. He further submits that he would be contended and satisfied in case he be permitted to file comprehensive application before the trial Court at appropriate stage under Section 245 Cr.P.

C and the trial Court should decide the same before proceedings further because it is not a case to put the evidence for answer under Section 313 Cr.P.C in the absence of any incriminating evidence. The prayer being innocuous and the same is allowed. Given above, the present petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. In case, any such application is filed, trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law. All pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 16.02.2023 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2023.02.21 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.