Anil Kumar Bansal v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36557-2024 Date of decision: 09.09.2024 ANIL KUMAR BANSAL ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

***** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is for issuing necessary directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to investigate FIR No.506, dated 20.11.2023 registered under Sections 120-B, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of the IPC, at Police Station Sector 17, HUDA Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar.

2.

On being put to notice on the last date of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions has submitted that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous as challan already stands presented. 3.

In the wake of the instructions received by the learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the instant POONAM RATHORE 2024.09.10 12:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-36557-2024 -2petition and prays for liberty to raise all his pleas before the trial Court at an appropriate stage.

4.

Dismissed as not pressed with liberty aforesaid. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE September 09, 2024 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2024.09.10 12:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh