B.K Sudershan v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25688-2015 Date of Decision: July 17, 2018 B.K.Sudershan .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA

Present:

Mr.C.S.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sandeep Moudgil, Addl.AG, Haryana.

Mr.Sukhandeep Singh,Advocate for Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr.Shailendra Jain, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Satyendra Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.5. ........

SURYA KANT, J.(ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner states that during pendency of this writ petition, Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gurugram, has been constituted, which has got statutory powers to adjudicate the controversy involved in this case. He prays that petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach RERA, Gurugram. Ordered accordingly.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE July 17, 2018 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2018.07.20 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh