Bikramjit Singh @ Vicky v. State Of Punjab And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M- 31245-2025 Date of Decision: 02.06.2025 BIKRAMJIT SINGH @ VICKY ....Petitioner vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:
Mr. A.S.Pundhir, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No. 2-complainant *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Section 482 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.153 dated 23.12.2023 under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Nurpur Bedi, District Rupnagar, Punjab (Annexure P-1).
2.
Counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that matter has been amicably compromised with the complainant. 3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab who on advance notice is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.06.02 04:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M- 31245-2025 -25.
Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate files Power of Attorney on behalf of the complainant. The same is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place. 6.
Counsel for the complainant does not dispute veracity and genuineness of compromise executed between the parties. He further submits that he has no objection if the petitioner is released on bail. 7.
Learned State counsel does not dispute the afore-stated factual and legal position.
8.
In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with a direction that Investigating Officer, during the pendency of investigation, shall not take coercive steps against the petitioner. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 02.06.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:
No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.06.02 04:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document