United Bank Of India v. State Of Punjab And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 24767 of 2016 (O&M) Decided on : 20.02.2017 United Bank of India . . . Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Rajvir Singh, Advocate for the non-applicant/petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab.

Ms. Neha Jain, Advocate for Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Advocate for applicant-respondents No.6 & 7.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Status report by way of affidavit of Sh. Rajesh Kumar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Amloh, District Fatehgarh Sahib, on behalf of respondents No.1, 3 & 4, has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

As per the status report filed on behalf of respondents No.1, 3 & 4, the physical possession of the property has been delivered to the petitioner-Bank.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner-Bank submitted that since the grievance of the petitioner-Bank, as raised in the present writ petition has been redressed, therefore, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.

4.

Ordered accordingly.

Jawala Ram 2017.02.21 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 24767 of 2016 (O&M) - 2 - 5.

Consequently, no further orders are required to be passed in CM No. 2430-CWP of 2017 and the same is disposed of as such. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) February 20, 2017 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2017.02.21 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh