Kamla Devi v. Mukesh Solanki

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP-2675-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.03.2023 Kamla Devi ....Petitioner

Versus

Mukesh Solanki ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Present:

Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral) The petitioner alleges violation of the order dated 04.05.2018 vide which a direction was issued to the Estate Officer, HUDA, Gurugram, to decide the legal notice.

Counsel for the respondent on the basis of the affidavit of the Estate Officer submits that the legal notice stands decided and the second ACP is refixed w.e.f. 01.01.2006 and payment of arrears of ACP, GIS has been done through RTGS in the account of the petitioner. It is also stated that the medical reimbursement could not be granted as the hospital was not on the government penal and in this regard, information has already been supplied to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous.

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with law, if so advised. (ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 09.03.2023 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2023.03.10 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.