Tek Chand And ORS. v. Union Of India And ORS.

CWP-21325-2017 -12024:PHHC:057756

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21325-2017 Date of Decision : 29.04.2024 TEK CHAND AND ORS.

... PETITIONERS

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.Mrinal Dewan, Advocate for Mr. R.S.Manhas, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Shivoy Dhir, Sr. Panel Counsel for the respondents-UOI.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of order dated 20.05.2017 (Annexure P-6) whereby the respondents have denied their claim for regularization of their services.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has no instructions from his clients.

3.

Mr. Shivoy Dhir, Sr. Panel Counsel submits that the petitioners since a long time are not in service. There is no policy of regularization. The issue involved in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of Supreme Court in Union of India and ors. vs. Vartak Labour Union, ( 2011) 4 SCC 200.

Anju Goel 2024.04.29 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-21325-2017 -22024:PHHC:057756
4.

In the wake of statement of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is hereby dismissed.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 29.04.2024 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anju Goel 2024.04.29 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh