Neeta Baghel And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Writ Petition No.24946 of 2016.

Date of Decision: December 02, 2016 Neeta Baghel and others ......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA.

*** Present: Mr.Bhupinder Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.R.D.Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J . (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only at this stage. On our asking, Mr.R.D.Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Let three copies of the writ petition be supplied to learned State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution.

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, it is not necessary to seek any counter-reply from respondent Nos.1 to 3 or to serve respondent No.4 at this stage.

The petitioners seek a mandamus for inclusion of the qualification of National Trade Certificate with Craft Instructor Training Course as an essential qualification for appointment to the post of Computer Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2017.01.09 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.24946 of 2016 [2] Instructor and Computer Operator/Programming Assistant in the Industrial Training Institutes etc.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Though it is for the Competent Authority to prescribe qualification for a post keeping in view the nature of duties, responsibility and pay-structure etc., but having regard to the averments made by the petitioners that for hundreds of other trades such qualification has been prescribed, we dispose of this writ petition without expressing any views on merits, with a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioners and take an appropriate decision as early as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE December 02, 2016 [HARI PAL VERMA] mohinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2017.01.09 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh