Savita Devi v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 26605 of 2014 Decided on : 13.05.2015 Savita Devi . . . Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL PRESENT: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. AG, Haryana.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, primarily seeking relief of writ of Mandamus that the acquisition proceedings have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for brevity 'the Act').

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the land of the other similarly situated persons have already been released. Therefore, in such a situation, he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the acquisition proceedings in accordance with law.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to file an appropriate writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (REKHA MITTAL) May 13, 2015 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2015.05.25 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh