Sunita Devi v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRM-M-31678-2026 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.146 CRM-M-31678-2026 Decided on : 29.05.2026 Sunita Devi ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL *** Present :

Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Advocate for the petitioner.

*** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL , J (ORAL) 1.

Through the instant petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS of 2023, the petitioner prays for issuance of direction to the official respondents No.2 and 3 to ensure that private respondent No.4 will not interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the petitioner. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner on asking for the relief (supra) has placed reliance upon the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of ICICI Bank Ltd. Versus Parkash Kaur and others RCR Criminal 2007 (2) page 76 and ICICI Bank versus Shanti Devi Sharma and others in SLP (Crl.) No.4935 of 2006, decided on 15.05.2008 and submits that the recovery of loan or seizure of vehicles could be done only through legal means.

3.

Without issuing notice of motion in the present petition, a MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.29 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh direction is issued to the official respondents No.1 to 3 to take necessary

CRM-M-31678-2026 2 steps to ensure that private respondent No.4 will not cause any obstruction in the plying of the petitioner's vehicle, except in accordance with due process of law.

4.

Disposed of accordingly.

29.05.2026 (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL ) mamta JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.29 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh