Sarabjit Kaur v. State Of Punjab And Others

2023:PHHC:101472

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7924-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.08.2023 Sarabjit Kaur ......... PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate and Ms. Rajwinder Kaur, Advocate for the peƟƟoner. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Vinod Kanwal, Advocate for respondents No. 5 to 9. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) The present peƟƟon has been filed ArƟcle 226 of the ConsƟtuƟon of India for issuance writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direcƟons be issued to protect life and liberty of the peƟƟoner and her three minor children at the hands of private respondents No. 5 to 9.

2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner as well as counsel for the private respondents on instrucƟons submits that the maƩer has been compromised between the parƟes. However, there are some small issues which are sƟll pending. 3.

In view of the above said statement, the peƟƟoner as well as the private respondents to solve the remaining differences amicably by interacƟng through their respecƟve counsel. For this purpose, Mr. Vinod Kanwal, Advocate for private respondents to visit the office of Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate and whenever he visits, he is also permiƩed to take his limited number of respondents to the chamber of Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate and such respondents are directed to behave with utmost respect. 4.

Given above, no order is required to be passed in the present peƟƟon and the same is disposed of. Liberty reserved to the peƟƟoner to come to this Court again, if need arises. All pending miscellaneous applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 07.08.2023 JyoƟ-II JYOTI 2023.08.09 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No