Union Of India & ORS v. The Central Administrative Tribunal And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.26058 of 2015 Date of Decision: March 28, 2016 Union of India and others ....Petitioners versus The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench & Ors .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

--- Present: Mr.Rajesh Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sundeep Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Union of India and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh have laid challenge to the order dated 01.05.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, whereby the claim of respondent No.2 to restrain the petitioner-Institute from promoting the reserved category candidates, was allowed and a direction has been issued to fill-up the vacancies through promotion without applying the rule of reservation. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly admits that the issue stands decided against the Institute by this Court vide judgment dated 13.01.2016 passed in CWP No.10681 of 2013 (Director Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research versus Central Administrative Tribunal, MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.04.26 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.26058 of 2015 [2] Chandigarh Bench and others).

For the reasons assigned in the cited case, the instant writ petition is dismissed.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE March 28, 2016 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.04.26 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh