Kayaan v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-18098-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.06.2026 Kayaan

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and Another

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ravinder Singh Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Vashishth, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that Haryana Public Service Commission has called category wise 12 times candidates which includes Horizontal as well as Vertical reservation e.g. 12 candidates were called for PWD-HH (General), thus, there is compliance of advertisement.

2.

Learned counsel representing the petitioner expressed his inability to controvert the aforesaid statement, however, seeks liberty to move an appropriate application, if cause survives. 3.

Disposed of with aforesaid liberty.

4.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.06.2026 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.06.15 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document