Raj Singh v. State Of Punjab & ORS

-1CWP No.26201 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.26201 of 2015 Date of decision: 17.12.2015 Raj Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) Instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for directing respondents No.1 to 6 to recover the embezzled amount of `4,34,172/- from respondent No.7. Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has made representations to various authorities but till date no action has been taken. He further submits that his representation dated 15.09.2012 (Annexure P-6) is pending before the Deputy Commissioner, Ferozepur, therefore, Deputy Commissioner may be directed to decide the same. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after perusing the paper-book, however, without commenting on merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of, without issuing notice to the RAVINDER SINGH 2015.12.18 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2CWP No.26201 of 2015 respondents, with a direction to respondent No.3 - Deputy Commissioner, Ferozepur, to look into the grievance of the petitioner specifically made in representation dated 15.09.2012 (Annexure P-6) and take decision in accordance with law within a period of two month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

(Paramjeet Singh) Judge December 17, 2015 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.12.18 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document