Madan Lal And ORS v. Ramesh Kumar And ORS.
!""#$%& '& ( )
( !& *$+!$%& !&!,'!+ *$-
,*$*.$/!+ *$-
"*#+!+ *$
-
- 0 ( ( ( ( Ms. Lipika, Advocate for appellant.
Mr. Saurabh Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vaneet K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr. Satpal Dhamija, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.
( (
!"
# ! $
! % &&
'
"
()) *
"
+
!,-
!
. /&"01
/ ! "
!
% 45 ' !
"
!
/
!
7!!
!"
7!
!
8
5
((((
(
(
!
1
!
!
5
"
!
"
! "
5"
5 !
!
"
!
"
/
:
5
! !
(
1 ( &
;
, %!
!
Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another [(2009) 6 Supreme Court Cases 121]"
5
!1 <30 !
"# $
%
& #$
$
!
$ ' ()*+,
-+$'()*.,
./$
' ()*0,
! !
$
1 $
$ 023
!
$
$
$
(,
"
4$ $
"
1 $ $ $ $
$
$ 023
!
023
% $
$
' $ !
'
" '
* * * * * * 42.
# (., (
5$ "#
# ,$
)6( )0-2 -)-0 ,$ $ 7')8 -/+2 $7')/+)+0 $7')0+/.2
$7')..).0 $ 7')+./02
$ $
$7'))0)00 $7'90//2 $7'8 /)/0 7'0//82
;
, %!
!
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 2 3
( 4 5
! % &&"
&91
&)
'
"
())"
1 * - 4!
5 =
! > *?- %
!
>
6 * -
!> *4- . !
5
"
"
"
!
! ="
> *@- A!!
> 1
=
5
B! !
!1 <52. : conventional heads $ !
;
<
1 ; -0$222 !
$; )$22$222 ; )$22$222 !
;
= $
$
$
> " $
& : &
!$ " $
$ !
$
"
"
& $
" $ " ! 1 $ $ $ !
; )0$222$ ; .2$222 ; )0$222
? ' & '
" & )23
@ @ @ @ @ 59.3 $ 023
$
.2 $
+23$ .202 1 02/2 $ )03
:
!
3 59.4 1 ' (,
!
$ .23
.2 : -03
.202 )23 02/2
!
59.5 4
$ !
$
+2+-
A
59.6.
A C
.-
59.7
59.8 ; $ $ $ !
; )0$222$ ; .2$222 ; )0$222
)23 )
;
, %!
!
Magma General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram & Others [2018(18) SCC 130]
Sarla Verma(supra) Pranay Sethi
4 (Supra)
!
.5
!
!1 E21 :# ? # F
<
1
$ G G
G
G$ G
G$ G
G
$ $ $ $ $
$
$ !
-) ) Spousal consortium
'
G
$ $ $ $
G
-) - Parental consortium
$ G
$
$ $ $
$
G
-) + Filial consortium
: "
7
# $ $
#
7 ' H !
7
$
$
7A :
$
1
$ $
F
: : % #
% $
G G
F
< 1 $
$
;.2$222
(
!
! 5
!
. &01
!
!
5
"
!
!
0
C
"
8"
"
!
8
! D1 (1&"
E$ %
'
%!B %
,"
9 )
!
!1 E14: -)6-2).$ ' ? #$
Lata Wadhwa and others v. State of Bihar and others 2001(4) RCR(Civil) 673)$ I'
EJ
"
" -2)-
!
; 6222*'
; 9222*'
:
" !
1 J ?
-22)(.,;#;(# ,/8+(
"
)96), %H
#
; +222*'
"
-+ 1
H"
"H K
-+ J
"
" 1 & 1 4: -)6-2).$
1
J F ( JF,
%H #
$ JF
#& $
$
1 "
" % !
$
$ $
$ "
$ L $ ' 1
$
$ !
1 $ # K $
; 9$222*' $ $
&
#
: 5
5"
B!
₹38 9
! !
5 !
!
!
!
!
5
! =
"
! !
!
(
: 5
;
, %!
! 5
B! "
1
!
!1 Sr. No.
Heads Compensation Awarded :
. "01 4!
=! . "99901 * 09-
:
. 6"&&01 *1999- ! / /
! 4 . ")"01 *6&& /-
&
@ . /"01 A! @= . /"01 )
!
% !
= 6" A
= 6" . )"01 ( *%#"
& 87 8 9
!+./%:*$
!
! & 68 9 $;#$/!+ #<*.$% & 88 9
87 8 68
%
"
;
, %!
! Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma 3 R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (2022) 5 Supreme Court Cases 107 1 (3 !
!
H
)
The respondents No.1 and 2 (driver and owner, respectively), jointly and severally are directed to deposit the enhanced amount along with interest at the rate of 9% with the Tribunal within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. The Tribunal is directed to disburse the same to the appellants-claimants in their bank account as per ratio settled in award dated 27.02.2010. The appellants-claimants are directed to furnish their bank account details to the Tribunal. (
*-"
"
( (
80 18
#0I
#