Charanjit Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others
CRM-M-34490-2024 (O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34490-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 12.08.2024 CHARANJIT SINGH AND OTHERS ....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :
Ms. Gauri Walia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Japjot Singh, AAG Punjab.
Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for Mr. Anmol Puri, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, petitioners seek quashing of FIR (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/settlement dated 15.07.2024 (Annexure P-2) executed between the parties. Details of the FIR are as follows:
FIR No.
Dated Sections Police Station 26.08.2021 452, 323, 506 and 34 IPC Division No.4, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana 2.
With the intervention of respectables and elderly people of the society, the parties have arrived at a settlement vide compromise deed dated 15.07.2024 (Annexure P-2), which is duly signed by them. The matter was referred to the Court below for recording of statements of the parties and to report with respect to genuineness of the compromise arrived at between the SANDAL SHARMA 2024.08.14 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CRM-M-34490-2024 (O&M) -2- parties. The learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Ludhiana vide report dated 06.08.2024 has apprised this Court that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine and without any pressure. The petitioners have also deposited the cost of Rs.10,000/- in compliance to the order dated 22.07.2024.
3.
Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are represented by their counsel and do not oppose the compromise.
4.
In view of the aforesaid report of the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Ludhiana and in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another", 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and "Narinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another", (2014) 6 SCC 466, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose can be served by keeping the criminal proceedings pending, since the complainant has himself compromised the dispute with the petitioners/ accused persons. 5.
In the circumstances, the present petition is allowed. FIR No.96 dated 26.08.2021 under Sections 452, 323, 506 and 34 of IPC registered at Police Station Division No.4, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise qua the present petitioners. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 12.08.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?
Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2024.08.14 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment