Mahipal Alias Mahipal Singh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34159-2024 Date of decision: 25.10.2024 MAHIPAL ALIAS MAHIPAL SINGH ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Sarvjit Singh Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Gagandeep Singh Chhina, AAG, Haryana.

***** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.197 dated 22.06.2024 under Sections 294, 323, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Khol, District Rewari.

2.

On the last date of hearing i.e. on 19.07.2024, while noticing the following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court had granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner and asked him to join investigation:- "Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that vague and general allegations have been levelled against the petitioner of having threatened the complainant and thereafter, having inflicted fist and kick blows on the injured along with his accomplices. It has been submitted that rather it is the opposite party, which had attacked the petitioner, as a result of which he - sustained injuries on his person for which he got himself treated at Civil Hospital Rewari, from where he was referred to a higher speciality."

POONAM RATHORE 2024.10.25 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-34159-2024 -23.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 19.07.2024, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency.

4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation much less for his custodial interrogation.

5.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 19.07.2024, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) October 25, 2024 JUDGE poonam Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2024.10.25 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh