Harkesh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.204 CRM-M No.40875 of 2021 Date of Decision: 07.03.2022 Harkesh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Apoorv Garg, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.228 dated 21.07.2021 registered at Police Station Punhana, District Nuh, under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Rajesh from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 25.11.2021, as passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature. In view of the above-discussed submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioner named Harkesh by this Court vide the said order dated 25.11.2021, is hereby made absolute. NEETU RANI 2022.03.07 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC

CRM-M No.40875 of 2021 -2- .....

However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 07.03.2022 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2022.03.07 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC