Ram Kumar v. Punjab And Haryana High Court, Chd And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No. 907 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 16.03.2016 Ram Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh and another ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. N.K. Joshi, Advocate for the respondents.
**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has already been granted the benefit, vide office order dated 10.12.2015 by the respondents, so, the present petition has become infructuous, which may be dismissed as such. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous.
March 16, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2016.03.17 11:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh